Methodology & Design Notes
The engineering behind radial length/impedance/efficiency: this is genuinely not a fixed physics constant — it's well-documented (particularly from Rudy Severns/N6LF's published ground-radial studies) that fewer, shorter radials mean more ground loss resistance, which raises the measured feedpoint impedance above the textbook 36Ω (which is why a lot of "just 4 radials" installations accidentally land near 50Ω) — while more/longer radials lower that loss resistance, improving efficiency but dropping impedance further from 50Ω, often needing a matching network. This calculator builds in a length/impedance/efficiency table across all six radial counts reflecting that tradeoff, clearly labeled as rule-of-thumb guidance rather than a precise NEC model, since real performance is soil-dependent.
Diagrams:
- An elevation view showing the vertical element height and ground-level feed
- A dynamically generated plan view — since "4 radials" and "32 radials" are fundamentally a top-down layout question, this draws N evenly-spaced spokes in real time based on your selection (verified: exactly 4 lines for N=4, exactly 32 for N=32)
⚡ Operating Frequency
Radial System
Calculated Results
Ground-Mount Vertical — Geometry
Not to scale · verify local clearance, safety, and code requirements before installation
| Band | Frequency | Vertical Height (ft) | Vertical Height (m) | Radial Length (ft) | Total Wire (ft) |
|---|